GX Solution
Carbon, calculated alongside production
Emissions and energy use are worked out from the data already coming off the floor, and the same figures carry through to reporting and reduction.
ROADMAP
From decisions to lower carbon and energy
Operating and energy data are used to account for emissions, and AI decisions to reduce them.
PAIN POINT
Carbon work gets stuck at the data
Environmental reporting keeps growing, but each site collects data its own way, so the same figures are gathered and reconciled again every time.PEF, CBAM, GHG and DPP each ask for a different scope and format, so every new regulation means rebuilding the data from scratch.The resulting numbers are hard to back up with which data and rules produced them.
On one carbon data system set up once, what PEF, CBAM, GHG and DPP ask for is answered together.Boundaries, emission factors and allocation rules are kept as history, so the basis shows as it is at review and reporting.
Equipment and external systems on the floor use different standards, making it hard to unify energy and production data into carbon activity data.Even power use differs in unit and collection cycle machine to machine, and without a link to production results it cannot be divided by product.People end up rebuilding it in spreadsheets again and again.
A data inventory and metering rules come first, then a common model such as AAS, so every system uses the same activity data.FEMS metering and MES production results are linked, carrying through to per-product carbon in one flow.
Many companies do not know where carbon management begins, and staffing it in-house costs a great deal of money and time.Handing it to outside consultants leaves a report, but the company struggles to repeat the same calculation on its own the next year.
From setting boundaries and surveying the site to calculation and reporting, it is done step by step together.Data collection and calculation procedures stay in the system, leaving an accounting process the company can repeat every year.
LINE-UP
Three solutions that handle carbon alongside production
CORA builds the data, COTO answers the regulations, and AI Carbon calculates carbon per product — joined as one.
01 · AI Carbon
Connect the evidence behind product carbon.
Process activity data is tied to emission factors, so each product's carbon is managed down to its calculation.
- Product · process data
- Carbon calculation support
- LCA · MRV evidence
02 · CORA
Make carbon data collection systematic.
A data optimization platform for trustworthy data
- Data inventory
- Metering infrastructure
- Collection · integration
03 · COTO
Keep the evidence from calculation to report.
An end-to-end (E2E) integrated management solution for carbon regulation compliance
- PEF · LCA
- CBAM reporting support
- Organisational carbon
INTEGRATION
Production data becomes carbon data
Carbon is not tallied separately: activity data comes straight from energy metering and production results.
WHY ITSCO
A proven GX record:energy and carbon projects delivered
Cumulative delivery and technology record · as of Sep 2026
Highlights
- 01Carbon data patentData collection for calculating product carbon emissionsNo. 10-2934907
- 02Carbon-neutral solution platformProduct-level carbon evidence automated into the AAS standard, keeping the European supply chain intact.GX case study
- 03CORA softwareCarbon Optimization & Resource Assessment, copyright registeredC-2025-058210
PROCESS
From boundaries to reporting, in four steps
Measurable data comes first; reporting and reduction follow, with the basis kept at every step.
Inventory · boundaries
- System and organisational boundaries set
- Process flow and data locations defined
- Units and emitting activities listed
Metering · collection
- Metering points and network surveyed
- Activity data collected and reconciled
- Linked to the AAS common model
Calculation · verification
- Emission factors and allocation set
- Product and organisational emissions calculated
- Basis of calculation traceable
Reporting · reduction
- PEF, CBAM, GHG and DPP reporting
- Reduction priorities reviewed
- History kept, calculation repeated
FAQ
Before you start: frequently asked questions
We are new to carbon management. Where do we start?
By making what is emitted, where and how much, measurable. Boundaries and process flow are set, and where each piece of data lives, in which unit, is listed in an inventory.
Do CBAM, PEF and the rest each need separate preparation?
No. On one carbon data system set up once, what PEF life-cycle assessment, CBAM reporting, the GHG Protocol and DPP require is handled together.
Can we use the FEMS and MES data we already have?
Yes. Energy metering and production results become the activity data directly. Carbon is not tallied separately; existing data is put on a common basis and linked to per-product calculation.
How is the basis of a calculation kept?
Boundaries, emission factors, allocation rules and the history of activity data are managed together, so a review or report can trace which data and rules each figure came from.
What comes after GX?
Carbon and energy data carry on into AI operating optimisation and digital twin simulation, so reduction options can be reviewed before they reach the floor.
CONNECT THE NEXT
Connected solutions
The solutions that take this one's data and results and carry them on.
START WITH YOUR FACTORY
Start with your factory's own challenges
Check where you stand with the AX readiness check first, then carry on to a consultation.